Recent Blog Posts
Police Targeting Drunk Drivers Near Bars Does Not Equal Entrapment
Police officers know the times when and places where people are most likely to commit a driving while intoxicated offense. Thus, police cars are often parked near bars and entertainment venues late at night, looking for drivers who show signs of impairment. This may seem unfair if you are one of the unfortunate people pulled over. Some defendants wonder whether this form of targeting qualifies as entrapment. However, it is rare to be able to prove that a police officer is guilty of entrapment in a DWI case. Claiming that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to pull you over is a more successful defensive strategy.
Entrapment
The legal definition of entrapment is when a police officer induces a defendant to commit a criminal offense which the defendant would not have otherwise committed. An officer watching for drunk drivers near a place where people have been drinking does not qualify as entrapment because the officer is not inducing the driver to:
Field Sobriety Test Not Enough to Prove Intoxication
Field sobriety tests are one of the initial tools police officers will use to determine whether someone is driving while intoxicated. Officers administering the tests are looking for signs of delayed reactions, poor coordination and an inability to follow directions, which may show that the driver is impaired. Officers and prosecutors have come to assume that certain standard tests are reliable in predicting intoxication. However, the tests do not definitively prove intoxication. Defendants can contest their DWI charges if the evidence relies too much on the field sobriety test results.
Test Origins
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration adopted the standard field sobriety tests based on a California study conducted during the late 1970s. Police officers were asked to judge whether subjects were intoxicated by using various field sobriety tests. Researchers identified three tests as having the highest accuracy rates:
Texas Man Claims DWI Laws Discriminate Against Alcoholics
A Texas man recently garnered attention when he contested his driving while intoxicated conviction by arguing that a Texas DWI law is unconstitutional. Specifically, he claimed that the 0.08 blood alcohol concentration limit discriminates against alcoholics. Neither the trial court nor the appellate court found the argument convincing, upholding the man’s conviction. There are reasons to question whether the BAC limit is an accurate measure of a driver's impairment. However, the defendant’s argument had little chance of succeeding because he was asking for special treatment, not equality.
Case Details
The defendant was facing his fourth DWI conviction when he attempted to quash the charges by challenging the constitutionality of Texas’ DWI law. A first or second DWI conviction is a misdemeanor unless there are aggravating factors. A third DWI conviction is a third-degree felony, which may result in:
Golf Carts Fall Under DWI Law
Using Golf Carts
DWI laws apply to golf carts because Texas law classifies them as motor vehicles. Their use is regulated in different ways than a normal motor vehicle:
- Golf carts do not need a license plate or proof of insurance;
- A golf cart driver needs a driver’s license only when driving it on a public street;
- Golf carts may be driven on public streets only within a gated community or on roads near a golf course; and
Lowering BAC Limit Would Increase Criminalization of Drivers
A recent report released by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine recommends that all states lower the blood alcohol concentration limit to 0.05 for charges of driving while intoxicated or driving under the influence of alcohol. The report states that:
- Deterioration in driving skills starts before people reach the 0.08 BAC limit; and
- Countries that use a 0.05 BAC limit have seen a decrease in vehicle accidents.
To be clear, there are no signs that Texas is considering lowering the legal limit. However, Utah became the first state to adopt a 0.05 BAC limit with a law it passed last year. The change is scheduled to go into effect on Dec. 30. Depending on the results, other states may pass similar laws. If the federal government supports the new BAC limit, it may offer incentives to states that comply. The goal of lowering the BAC limit is to increase driver safety. There are a couple of reasons why it may instead increase the criminalization of drivers:
DWI Evidence Suppressed Because of Unwarranted Stop
Texas police must have reason to believe someone may be driving while intoxicated or breaking the law before performing a DWI traffic stop. Minor traffic violations or erratic driving are often enough justification to pull over a driver, after which a police officer may observe signs that the driver is intoxicated. However, police officers can have an overly broad interpretation of what qualifies as suspicious driving activity. A Texas man charged with misdemeanor DWI was able to suppress the evidence from his DWI stop because the officer could not prove that there was reasonable suspicion that the driver was committing a crime.
Case Details
In Texas v. Bernard, an officer performed an early morning traffic stop of the defendant, claiming that she had observed him swerving into multiple lanes and wanted to check on his well being. There was video footage from the police vehicle of the entire incident, from the point that the officer started observing the driver through the traffic stop. The video and the officer’s own testimony suggested that the driver did not commit any violations or behave in a dangerous manner:
Safe Driving Tips After Your First DWI
When you have regained your driving privileges after a charge of driving while intoxicated, you must reassess your driving habits that led to the initial arrest. Most DWI arrests occur because drivers commit traffic violations or are involved in accidents. Once a police officer suspects you may be impaired, you are at risk of being charged with DWI. Avoiding drinking and driving is the most important step you can take to prevent a DWI arrest. However, there are other driving tips that will keep you safe and help you avoid police attention.
Being Aware of Impairment
There are conditions other than intoxication that can impair your driving skills. You may be sick, emotionally upset or experiencing an adverse side effect from a medication. However, the most common driving impairment is drowsiness. Whether due to lack of sleep or overworking yourself, being tired slows down the mental responsiveness you need to be a safe driver. Police can also confuse the symptoms of drowsiness with the symptoms of intoxication. To avoid impaired driving, you should:
BAC Results May Not Prove Innocence in DWI Arrest
Texas drivers should be familiar with the number 0.08. That is the blood alcohol concentration level at which someone is considered legally intoxicated. A breath or blood test result of 0.08 or higher will lead to an arrest and charge of driving while intoxicated. However, having a BAC that is less than the legal limit does not preclude a driver from a DWI charge. Texas police officers have the discretion to decide that a driver was legally impaired by an intoxicating substance, even if medical records do not prove it.
Legal Definition
The Texas Penal Code states that police officers can identify intoxication in one of two circumstances:
- The driver does not have normal use of his or her mental or physical faculties due to the presence of alcohol or another intoxicating substance; or
- The driver’s BAC is 0.08 or greater.
By law, a driver is assumed to be intoxicated if his or her BAC is over the legal limit. However, the driver may still be ruled as legally intoxicated if there is evidence of some alcohol in his or her system and he or she showed signs of impairment. A police officer may determine that a driver is impaired if he or she:
Country Star Travis Unable to Stop DWI Video from Becoming Public
A federal court recently denied country music singer Randy Travis’ request to prevent the release of a dashboard camera video from his 2012 arrest for driving while intoxicated. The video shows a disoriented and naked Travis ranting to police officers, which Travis claims may have been the result of mixing alcohol with prescription medication. Travis plead guilty to DWI, but he asked the Texas Attorney General’s office to withhold the video because of its embarrassing nature. The Texas Attorney General’s office ruled that it would allow an edited version of the video to be released. Travis filed a lawsuit to prevent the video’s release, but Texas district and appellate courts both ruled against him. The Texas Supreme Court refused to hear the case, which led to the federal lawsuit. The issue shows how the public’s right to information can be at odds with a defendant’s privacy.
Case Background
Why Female DWI Arrests Have Increased
When it comes to arrests for driving while intoxicated, men far outpace women. According to a Texas Department of Public Safety report, 48,332 men were arrested in 2016 for DWI, as opposed to 13,384 women. Annual arrest totals for each gender have decreased by an almost identical percentage since 2012. Looking further back at DWI statistics showed a different trend between genders. Since 1999:
- The number of male DWI arrests in Texas has decreased by 40 percent; and
- The number of female DWI arrests in Texas has increased by 12 percent.
To be fair, the lowest male arrest total for one year since 1999 is still more than twice as much as the highest female arrest total. Because of the lower number of female arrests, small fluctuations will appear as higher percentage changes. However, the data correlates with an even longer trend of female DWI arrests increasing from previous generations. There are several societal changes that may explain the increase: